Someday, he stops and endeavours never to move ever again.
He is docile and he gives birth,
(the notion of life in slow motion.)
He is docile and has no idea who he is,
If he is not a lover boy
and right now, there is no boy to love, no skin
to inhabit.
So, he devours his short-comings and
gives birth.
He is nothing to no one and by default he is nothing and no one.
He writes in questions and when the subject of his questioning is absent, he no longer becomes
a writer,
he no longer,
becomes.
He is someone’s docile, does not endeavour much
but he also learned to swallow when necessary,
shouldn’t that have accounted for something?
Love does not give back, give birth
and here, even buildings are made up but he was intentional.
Shouldn’t that have accounted for something?
He is docile because to be passive was to despise and he thrived in tolerance.
To be passive was to despise, he can finally see it.
He stopped fighting because to fight is to resist and to be loved
is to obey.
To fight is to resist and to be loved is to obey.
So, he will obey until proven otherwise.
Shouldn’t that account for something?
